[RFC] Suggested "combined tree" for easier development and Franky integration.

Volker Lendecke Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Fri Sep 5 16:15:55 GMT 2008

On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 11:56:20AM -0400, Derrell Lipman wrote:
> How do you handle the "install" target in the combined structure?  Does a
> "make install" in samba3 still, by default, overwrite a "make install" in
> samba4 and vice versa, or have you come up (I hope!) with a nice solution so
> that the two can both be installed and co-exist?

Yes, as it stands now they overwrite each other. Future
discussion will for example have to solve which of the net
binaries will be used how and so on. There is a lot to be
solved/merged/migrated etc, this current effort is step zero
of a loong way.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20080905/24b9c0cc/attachment.bin

More information about the samba-technical mailing list