[RFC] Suggested "combined tree" for easier development and Franky integration.

simo idra at samba.org
Fri Sep 5 16:18:09 GMT 2008

On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 11:56 -0400, Derrell Lipman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Kai Blin <kai at samba.org> wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > at the last Franky meeting, we realized that our current attempt at
> > creating a
> > combined Samba3/Samba4 build using git submodules was clumsy and fragile.
> >
> > So we came up with a combined tree solution to address this issue.
> > Incidentally, this combined tree might be useful before we get the
> > integrated
> > build sorted out already.
> ...
> How do you handle the "install" target in the combined structure?  Does a
> "make install" in samba3 still, by default, overwrite a "make install" in
> samba4 and vice versa, or have you come up (I hope!) with a nice solution so
> that the two can both be installed and co-exist?

I guess one of the 2 sources default prefix can be changed so that they
do not conflict ?


Simo Sorce
Samba Team GPL Compliance Officer <simo at samba.org>
Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat Inc. <simo at redhat.com>

More information about the samba-technical mailing list