AIX VFS mkdir & NFS4 acl bug? Was: [RELEASE
PLANNING 3.2] 3.2.0 final vs. rc3
jojowil at hvcc.edu
Thu Jun 12 11:49:27 GMT 2008
---- Original message ----
>Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:17:05 +0200
>From: Volker Lendecke <Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE>
>Subject: Re: [RELEASE PLANNING 3.2] 3.2.0 final vs. rc3
>To: Karolin Seeger <ks at sernet.de>
>Cc: William Jojo <jojowil at hvcc.edu>,samba-technical at samba.org
>On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 08:34:37AM +0200, Karolin Seeger wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 07:45:26AM -0400, William Jojo wrote:
>> > I sent a few fixes for AIX to the list about a week ago. Do you want a formal bug report?
>> > I am happy to do it to get these fixes in. :-)
>> Sorry that your patches not upstream up to now and thanks for the heads up!
>Pushed them to 3-2-test. The aixacl2 one is just obviously
>correct, and on -brtl I have to trust you :-)
Thanks, Volker & Karolin!
How soon before release? I have stumbled upon a mkdir (at least the smoking gun) bug whe using aixacl2 that applies AIXC acls when NFS4 is on the parent with "fidi" set. So it appears to ignore any exisitng ACL regardless of inheritance and applies a 755 (based on umask). Then going to security tab in windows cascades the issue into three allow and three deny entries as the AIXC acl is converted to NFS4 in the vfs and presented to XP (with appropriate deny out of order message from XP :-) )
Generating logs to find the source. Once I have more detail, I'll open a formal bug on this one. I have a feeling I will miss 3.2.0 final.
>application.pgp-signature (1k bytes)
More information about the samba-technical