Kerberos 5 and NTLMv2 without SPNEGO?

[George Colley]

On Jul 1, 2008, at 8:49 AM, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Michael B Allen wrote:
>> Dear Cousin,
>>
>> Does anyone know if it's ok to do Kerberos 5 and / or NTLMSSP without
>> SPNEGO for SMB_COM_SESSION_SETUP_ANDX?
>>
>> I'm 95% sure the answer is "yes" but it would be nice if someone gave
>> me assuring pat on the head.
>
> Pretty sure.  Been a while since I looked but I think this is how
> Steve previously did NTLMSSP in the cifs fs.
You can with NTLMSSP, not sure about Kerberos. In fact Windows 2003  
will do this if they are not part of a domain.

>
>
>
>
>
>
> cheers, jerry
> - --
> =====================================================================
> Samba                                    ------- http://www.samba.org
> Likewise Software          ---------  http://www.likewisesoftware.com
> "What man is a man who does not make the world better?"      --Balian
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFIalInIR7qMdg1EfYRAmyQAKCw0urs/1qlp7Ev8OM95uSMAwZnswCgmalo
> z3DVaCqgS3TRHEUkq7WSRfI=
> =BBs+
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----