Kerberos 5 and NTLMv2 without SPNEGO?

[Gerald (Jerry) Carter]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Michael B Allen wrote:
> Dear Cousin,
> 
> Does anyone know if it's ok to do Kerberos 5 and / or NTLMSSP without
> SPNEGO for SMB_COM_SESSION_SETUP_ANDX?
> 
> I'm 95% sure the answer is "yes" but it would be nice if someone gave
> me assuring pat on the head.

Pretty sure.  Been a while since I looked but I think this is how
Steve previously did NTLMSSP in the cifs fs.





cheers, jerry
- --
=====================================================================
Samba                                    ------- http://www.samba.org
Likewise Software          ---------  http://www.likewisesoftware.com
"What man is a man who does not make the world better?"      --Balian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIalInIR7qMdg1EfYRAmyQAKCw0urs/1qlp7Ev8OM95uSMAwZnswCgmalo
z3DVaCqgS3TRHEUkq7WSRfI=
=BBs+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----