Kerberos 5 and NTLMv2 without SPNEGO?
Gerald (Jerry) Carter
jerry at samba.org
Tue Jul 1 15:49:59 GMT 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Michael B Allen wrote:
> Dear Cousin,
> Does anyone know if it's ok to do Kerberos 5 and / or NTLMSSP without
> SPNEGO for SMB_COM_SESSION_SETUP_ANDX?
> I'm 95% sure the answer is "yes" but it would be nice if someone gave
> me assuring pat on the head.
Pretty sure. Been a while since I looked but I think this is how
Steve previously did NTLMSSP in the cifs fs.
Samba ------- http://www.samba.org
Likewise Software --------- http://www.likewisesoftware.com
"What man is a man who does not make the world better?" --Balian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the samba-technical