PATCH samba cache and read-ahead
jra at samba.org
Thu Jan 3 17:40:38 GMT 2008
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 11:07:04AM +0000, Amin Azez wrote:
> but INFO_LEVEL seems to suggest something else not from the same range
> that the TRANSCAT2_* opcodes occupy.
> Nothing seems to be making use of the INFO_LEVEL_IS_UNIX macro (not that
> smb caching is restricted to Unix anyway)
> In short, I'm not able to be certain which TRANS2 sub command range I
> can use, please could you offer some advice?
> And should I use multiple TRANSACT2 sub opcodes, or make some sub-sub
> opcodes do you think?
Check out include/trans2.h in S3, and also the header files in cifsfs.
Currently that's where the allocations in this range are being done.
It's not formal right now, so please coordinate with myself and Stevef
to get an allocation.
More information about the samba-technical