Extending LDB for Extended DNs

Stefan (metze) Metzmacher metze at samba.org
Fri Dec 12 11:35:36 GMT 2008

Andrew Bartlett schrieb:
> On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 13:38 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>> On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 21:21 -0500, simo wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 11:35 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 18:28 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 18:23 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 22:33 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>>>>>>> Great.  I've been working on this hard for the past week or so.  See
>>>>>>> http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=abartlet/samba.git/.git;a=shortlog for the
>>>>>>> current work in progress.
> I've just updated this tree again.
>>> Anyway I would not put it in if it is going to break the LDAP backend,
>>> we should have it working for.
>>> I have gone through great pain myself to make sure my stuff did work
>>> with LDAP with the async patches, is there a reason to apply a different
>>> standard in this case ?
>> No, there isn't, and you are right to hold me to that standard.  I'm
>> working on the changes to allow this to work with OpenLDAP's dereference
>> control right now.  
> I've updated my tree, and with some small changes to ldb
> (ldb_module_send_entry() now takes a control parameter) and a lot of
> other work on modules and control parsing, it all works!
> I would like to merge the above tree into 'master'. 
> Any comments?

I'll review your stuff over the weekend.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20081212/a124e471/signature.bin

More information about the samba-technical mailing list