Extending LDB for Extended DNs
abartlet at samba.org
Fri Dec 12 11:01:27 GMT 2008
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 13:38 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 21:21 -0500, simo wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 11:35 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 18:28 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 18:23 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 22:33 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > > > > Great. I've been working on this hard for the past week or so. See
> > > > > > http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=abartlet/samba.git/.git;a=shortlog for the
> > > > > > current work in progress.
I've just updated this tree again.
> > Anyway I would not put it in if it is going to break the LDAP backend,
> > we should have it working for.
> > I have gone through great pain myself to make sure my stuff did work
> > with LDAP with the async patches, is there a reason to apply a different
> > standard in this case ?
> No, there isn't, and you are right to hold me to that standard. I'm
> working on the changes to allow this to work with OpenLDAP's dereference
> control right now.
I've updated my tree, and with some small changes to ldb
(ldb_module_send_entry() now takes a control parameter) and a lot of
other work on modules and control parsing, it all works!
I would like to merge the above tree into 'master'.
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20081212/fe2a74e4/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical