Volker Lendecke Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Fri Aug 8 09:22:42 GMT 2008

On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 07:43:09AM -0400, simo wrote:

> If we salvage the "default" option we can still have great flexibility
> w/o too much pain. Moving to a per range allocator would make things
> simpler to understand from a configuration POV, although it would

Sorry, but here I disagree. Having multiple allocators is
bad from my point of view. I don't understand the scenario
that you want to cover with it.

> It still means it will break post 3.0.25 configurations that started
> using the new scheme. I guess we should do the change in 3.3 and not
> 3.2.x so that there are more chances people will check for such major
> changes on a version change.

Sure. This is 3.3, not 3.2.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :

More information about the samba-technical mailing list