http://git.samba.org/?p=vl/samba.git/.git;a=shortlog;h=idmap

[Douglas VanLeuven]

Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 07:43:09AM -0400, simo wrote:
> 
>> If we salvage the "default" option we can still have great flexibility
>> w/o too much pain. Moving to a per range allocator would make things
>> simpler to understand from a configuration POV, although it would
> 
> Sorry, but here I disagree. Having multiple allocators is
> bad from my point of view. I don't understand the scenario
> that you want to cover with it.
> 

I was at sea when you started this thread or I would have commented 
earlier.  I'm unclear about one implication.

What about the case of idmap_ad which is not writable but desired to be 
the default with a tdb backend for local accounts each with different 
uid/gid ranges?

Is the new system going to work for that scenario?

Doug