[RFC] Reasonable timeframe to review git repos and workflow?
Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
metze at samba.org
Fri Oct 5 11:30:25 GMT 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Gerald (Jerry) Carter schrieb:
> I'm willing to spend some of this weekend doing the svn
> to git migration. What I need to know is how much time
> people need to review the draft repos that were posted
> and comment on the workflow proposal.
I just found that some (mostly all) tags from the cvsimport are missing.
Also there are some useless tags like:
maybe also 'release-3-1-0'
And the release-4-0-0tp1 is missing.
abartlet: why don't we have a release-4-0-0tp5 and release-4-0-0alpha1
tags in svn?
It would be perfect if we could:
- - all cvs release-* tags
- - have the email addresses also for cvs commits
- - have a fully reconstructed history for all
svn based tags, so that the CVSIN commits will
go complete out of the repository.
watch gitk --all
And much perfect would be to fix tridges commit messages
which mostly start with an empty line...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the samba-technical