[RFC] Reasonable timeframe to review git repos and workflow?

[Stefan (metze) Metzmacher]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Gerald (Jerry) Carter schrieb:
> Folks,
> 
> I'm willing to spend some of this weekend doing the svn
> to git migration.  What I need to know is how much time
> people need to review the draft repos that were posted
> and comment on the workflow proposal.

Hi Jerry,

I just found that some (mostly all) tags from the cvsimport are missing.
Also there are some useless tags like:

're'
'pidl-1'
'samba4'
'DAY_ZERO-*'
'SOC-jelmer'
'trunk-final-update'

maybe also 'release-3-1-0'

And the release-4-0-0tp1 is missing.

abartlet: why don't we have a release-4-0-0tp5 and release-4-0-0alpha1
tags in svn?


It would be perfect if we could:
- - all cvs release-* tags

- - have the email addresses also for cvs commits

- - have a fully reconstructed history for all
  svn based tags, so that the CVSIN commits will
  go complete out of the repository.

watch gitk --all

And much perfect would be to fix tridges commit messages
which mostly start with an empty line...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHBiBRm70gjA5TCD8RAhsOAJ95opTYaALfv46nxpMnJ0W9DhWHvQCggWss
UweOoUa/LnZ4jk3XaTg4GtY=
=QWUd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----