svn commit: samba r22810 -
in branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/torture/libnet: .
mimir at samba.org
Mon May 14 04:56:18 GMT 2007
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 08:03:13PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 11:27 +0200, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
> > Andrew,
> > > > > Log:
> > > > > when a test runs against domain controller use domain name
> > > > > instead of target host name specified in binding string.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > metze: this fixes the problem with passing name resolution
> > > > > down the socket wrapper calls. NET tests now run against
> > > > > $SERVER flawlessly.
> > > >
> > > I'm confused. Does this mean that the tests can no longer be targeted
> > > at a particular binding string/server by the torture code?
> > These few tests should not be targeted at a particular server because
> > they are run against given domain. That's because the libnet function
> > is supposed to find the DC first and then connect it.
> > Other tests still use the binding string.
> I think it will remain important to be *able* to down a target server in
> these cases, particularly if we wish to do things like have a preferred
> DC, or just for debugging.
Yes, I was also thinking about some fallback mechanism. I'm just not sure
if it should be one of the parameters or rather information stored in
libnet context after first successful connection. I'd prefer the latter
Samba Team member http://www.samba.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20070514/0b371663/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical