svn commit: samba r22810 - in branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/torture/libnet: .

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 11:27 +0200, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
> Andrew,
> 
> On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 05:22:23PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 07:06 +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > > 
> > > mimir at samba.org schrieb:
> > > > Author: mimir
> > > > Date: 2007-05-11 21:48:29 +0000 (Fri, 11 May 2007)
> > > > New Revision: 22810
> > > > 
> > > > WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=rev&root=samba&rev=22810
> > > > 
> > > > Log:
> > > > when a test runs against domain controller use domain name
> > > > instead of target host name specified in binding string.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > metze: this fixes the problem with passing name resolution
> > > > down the socket wrapper calls. NET tests now run against
> > > > $SERVER flawlessly.
> > > 
> > I'm confused.  Does this mean that the tests can no longer be targeted
> > at a particular binding string/server by the torture code?
> 
> These few tests should not be targeted at a particular server because
> they are run against given domain. That's because the libnet function
> is supposed to find the DC first and then connect it.
> Other tests still use the binding string.

I think it will remain important to be *able* to down a target server in
these cases, particularly if we wish to do things like have a preferred
DC, or just for debugging.  

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.                  http://redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20070512/3341afaa/attachment.bin