[SAMBA3] tdb signed vs. unsigned char *

[Volker Lendecke]

On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 08:23:22AM +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> > Volker,
> > 
> >  > But then I would prefer a _pure_ char -> unsigned char patch
> >  > without any strlen() vs strlen()+1 stuff in.
> > 
> > perhaps it's best done in two stages, with a straight type change
> > first, and cleanup via helper functions after that?
> 
> ok, I'll do the helper cleanup first, and then the type change, because
> otherwise I need to add ugly casts to remove compiler warnings.
> Also I can split up the helper cleanup into smaller commits.
> 
> does that sound ok?

Yes, very much. Thanks!

Volker
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20070326/08de176c/attachment.bin