[SAMBA3] tdb signed vs. unsigned char *
Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
metze at samba.org
Mon Mar 26 06:23:22 GMT 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
tridge at samba.org schrieb:
> Volker,
>
> > But then I would prefer a _pure_ char -> unsigned char patch
> > without any strlen() vs strlen()+1 stuff in.
>
> perhaps it's best done in two stages, with a straight type change
> first, and cleanup via helper functions after that?
ok, I'll do the helper cleanup first, and then the type change, because
otherwise I need to add ugly casts to remove compiler warnings.
Also I can split up the helper cleanup into smaller commits.
does that sound ok?
metze
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGB2bam70gjA5TCD8RAjB7AJwO78ANS0iq3pCc/RNDcEOQLu5iUgCg0CNB
teb+EeZlD1z6h01PDaPABLA=
=xVly
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list