svn commit: samba r20938 - in
Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Mon Jan 22 06:27:00 GMT 2007
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 05:17:39PM +1100, tridge at samba.org wrote:
> > You greatly reduced the window, but I think it is still
> > there. It's the fact that the test if we are blocked (line
> > events_signal.c:250) and the actual unblocking are two
> > different calls.
> I think that one is OK, as if we are blocked (and thus go into the
> if() statement) then that particular signal can't happen, so you can't
> get it blocked again between the SIG_PENDING() and the unblock.
I was more worried about the other way round: Non-blocked at
the if statement and becoming blocked before the unblock.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20070122/870b5d04/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical