svn commit: samba r20938 - in
Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Mon Jan 22 06:04:28 GMT 2007
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 10:35:55AM +1100, tridge at samba.org wrote:
> > Don't we need sig_atomic_t's here? If I get this right, then
> > these are variables written by the signal handler and read
> > by the main program and vice versa.
> Strictly yes, but see:
> basically 'int' (and uint32_t) is atomic on any platform that Samba
> has any chance of running on. If you want to change it to
> sig_atomic_t and add a configure test then it won't do any harm, but I
> don't think it makes any difference either.
How could using sig_atomic_t hurt here?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20070122/c75ad16f/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical