svn commit: samba r20938 - in branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/lib/events: .

tridge at tridge at
Sun Jan 21 23:35:55 GMT 2007


 > Don't we need sig_atomic_t's here? If I get this right, then
 > these are variables written by the signal handler and read
 > by the main program and vice versa.

Strictly yes, but see:

basically 'int' (and uint32_t) is atomic on any platform that Samba
has any chance of running on. If you want to change it to
sig_atomic_t and add a configure test then it won't do any harm, but I
don't think it makes any difference either.

Cheers, Tridge

More information about the samba-technical mailing list