svn commit: samba r21125 - in
jelmer at vernstok.nl
Sun Feb 4 13:26:45 GMT 2007
On Sat, 2007-02-03 at 09:43 +1100, tridge at samba.org wrote:
> > This patch accepts the NEW/OLD/MODIFIED entries in any order.
> > Comments welcome!
> I think we should at least give a warning for the wrong order. I know
> it's hard to get the order right with inotify, but I don't think its
> impossible. For example, we could buffer an event waiting for the
> other half to turn up.
> Jelmer, maybe a torture_warning() function would be useful? It would
> be used when we don't want to flag an test failure, but we do want to
> flag something that isn't quite right and that a developer should look
> at if they are working on a paricular subsystem.
Yes, I agree that would be nice. I'll have a look at integrating it into
my testsuite changes.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20070204/15f1123b/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical