Samba 4 - Join results - r26353

Andrew Bartlett abartlet at samba.org
Mon Dec 10 21:35:37 GMT 2007


On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 21:45 +0100, Michele Baldessari wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 12:56 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-12-09 at 14:29 +0100, Michele Baldessari wrote:
> > > Hi Samba4 hackers,
> > > 
> > > I took some time today to test the current samba4 (r26353). Here are the
> > > results of joining 2000, 2003 and XP clients against a SAMBA4 DC:
> > > 
> > > - 2000 - SUCCESS
> > > 
> > > http://michele.pupazzo.org/files/samba/20071209/samba4-2000-join.log
> > > http://michele.pupazzo.org/files/samba/20071209/2000-client-join.pcap
> > > 
> > > - XP - FAILURE
> > > 
> > > http://michele.pupazzo.org/files/samba/20071209/xp-client-join.pcap
> > > http://michele.pupazzo.org/files/samba/20071209/samba4-xp-join.log
> > > 
> > > - 2003 - FAILURE
> > > 
> > > http://michele.pupazzo.org/files/samba/20071209/samba4-2003-join.log
> > > http://michele.pupazzo.org/files/samba/20071209/2003-client-join.pcap
> > > 
> > > At the above links you'll find smbd logs (level 5) and traffic traces.
> > 
> > I think the issue is that your WinXP client cannot contact Samba's LDAP
> > port.  The client's connection is refused with a TCP reset in packets
> > 129. 131 133.  This causes the join to be undone.
> 
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> (ok there is something a little fishy going on...)
> I've just updated the svn tree to todays snapshot and it worked. I see
> you expanded the torture test but nothing else, but just to be sure I
> reverted to -r26353 and it did work (unlike before). No firewalls were
> ever involved (it's a flat network without anything messing in between).

Fishy indeed. 

> Then I redid the -r26353 build from scratch, removed the install dir
> (/usr/local/samba) and re-provisioned: again the error.
> Retried from todays revision and again no go. 
> 
> I'll see if I can find a more stable pattern here. If you need traces or
> more infos, let me know

If you can make it fail again, please use netstat to see what ports smbd
is really bound to.  If we are failing to bind to LDAP for some reason,
we should chase it down.

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20071211/b11fdc0e/attachment.bin


More information about the samba-technical mailing list