[Samba 4] SWAT

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 08:26 +0200, Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer wrote:
> Hi all!
> 
> I thought also a bit to get some opinions about the "new" SWAT in SAMBA 
> 4. Because to me seems it unmaintained at the moment and the compilation 
> with the autogen.sh is an exercise to patient. Maybe should it be left 
> outside from the normal build. The option AUTOGEN_SKIP_SWAT isn't enough 
> for me, because then, at the installation point it is requested!

While I too have reservations about the new SWAT, I think the path
forward is to fix up the new LDB browser (which to my mind is the main
part of value in the 'new SWAT').  

That said, Samba4's SWAT desperately needs some care and attention.  Can
someone step up and take that on?  This area of web programming isn't
something I'm comfortable with - I'll keep hacking on the old style
stuff for the moment - but the LDB browser could be a very useful
function and central administration point. 

Andrew Bartlett
-- 
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20070830/aeb4c8ca/attachment.bin