CTDB
Andrew B. Lundgren
lundgren at byu.net
Thu Aug 16 21:19:08 GMT 2007
I am evaluating setting up a several terabyte cluster on Linux. I am
currently working to select the cluster software to use and have a few
questions about CTDB and samba.
I guess the first one should be how stable is CTDB? Would you consider
it production ready?
Given a 4 node cluster, with file A residing on node 2. When a windows
client requests file A, how does the data get to it?
Will the client go to any random node in the cluster and request the
file A and then be directed to node 2 to pull the file, or will the file
be pulled to the random node from node 2 and then sent to the client?
I have not settled on the clustering technology to use. I think I have
narrowed a little bit down to lustre, gluster or RHES/CentOS 5 cluster
file system.
I like the fact that RH includes the cluster with the distro.
I like that from what I can tell, gluster does not require a custom kernel.
I like that lustre is one of the primary test beds for CTDB.
Are there any stark differences with CTDB and these clusters that should
drive a preference of one of them?
Thank you!
--
Andrew Lundgren
Andrew.Lundgren at byu.net
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list