Fixed exclude_dir in the recycle vfs
jon.gough at eclipsesystems.com.au
Fri Apr 6 02:26:00 GMT 2007
I cannot test this change as I get the following error
Apr 6 10:07:25 saturn smbd: The module was compiled against
Apr 6 10:07:25 saturn smbd: current SMB_VFS_INTERFACE_VERSION is 16.
Apr 6 10:07:25 saturn smbd: Please recompile against the
current Samba Version!
I have installed samba.Version 3.0.24-3.fc6 from an RPM on my system.
I have checked out the latest Samba 3.0 release base and compiled
that. I have taken the recycle.so module from that and put it into
the samba runtime area. I have had to remove this due to the error
above. When will the version 21 of the interface be in the mainstream RPMs?
I presume your change is to make the system look for non-root
directories and exclude those, ie
recycle:exclude_dir = temp Downloads
will find directories like:
but as I cant test it currently what happens with
Is this excluded as the root of the name is in the exclude list?
Is goodstuff ignored due to matching the 'temp' part of the path?
The code I supplied required
recycle:exclude_dir = temp/ Downloads/
and would find
However, all subordinate (child) directories would be ignored, ie
would be ignored.
At 05:55 5/04/2007, Jeremy Allison wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 09:39:03AM +1100, Jon Gough wrote:
> > Jerry,
> > I have not heard from you and I have not seen the change turn up
> > in the SVN source library. I have attached the latest change I
> > supplied again just in case the old one got lost. (this is against
> > the CURRENT 3_0_release base) .
> > Can you give me some indication of when this fix will either be
> > accepted or rejected.
> I'm not too keen on this change. Here is something I
>think might do a more natural fix for the "exclude dir"
>parameter. Can you test it out and let me know please ?
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 000730-4, 05/04/2007
Tested on: 6/04/2007 12:26:05 PM
avast! is copyright (c) 2000-2007 ALWIL Software.
More information about the samba-technical