ldb for 3.0.24?

Gerald (Jerry) Carter jerry at samba.org
Wed Nov 29 22:16:43 GMT 2006

Hash: SHA1

tridge at samba.org wrote:
> Jerry,
>  > gahhh!!!  I'm know I'm going to get flamed for this but *this*
>  > kind of issue was exactly stability I voiced concerned over.
> Looks like I've been bitten by timezones again - the 
> whole discussion has come and gone and I'm only just
> reading it :-)

Sorry.  I didn't think (or hoped) this would be a big deal.
Right now, we are shooting for 3.0.24 by the end of Jan, 2007.
Jeremy says he'll do enough QA on the ldb-based group
mapping code to certify it by then.  So no big deal.
We're back on.

> The indexing fields in ldb are not the users data. 

Yeah.  Jeremy pointed that out to me.  I assumed from metze's
comments that the indexing had broken Samba 3 as well.
My fault for not verifying myself.  Hope this clears
everything up and people can go back to their normal
routines :-)

cheers, jerry
Samba                                    ------- http://www.samba.org
Centeris                         -----------  http://www.centeris.com
"What man is a man who does not make the world better?"      --Balian
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org


More information about the samba-technical mailing list