jpeach at samba.org
Wed Jun 21 23:19:05 GMT 2006
On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 17:06 -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> Mathias Dietz wrote:
> > The most important step is to define this management API and to
> > implement it inside samba3. Exporting this API via rpc is secondary.
> Sorry. I disagree. just to make this clear, I believe MS-RPC
> *is* the API. Why reinvent the wheel? Maybe we'll need to
> have client RPC over unix domain sockets for local.
> So the question is how do you use RPC before Samba is up
> and running? The answer is a simple provision script.
> I mean very simple. Just enough to get the server up
> and have a single account.
> > SWAT would be ok for the first consumer / to polish the API.
> Please...no. We need an API that will get used. SWAT
> has its fingers in everything and is just broken as a
> management tool.
Agreed. I'm all for ditching SWAT. There's an ocean of management tools
out there, both open source and proprietary. IMHO, providing a rich
management interface for these is of more value than supporting SWAT.
James Peach | jpeach at samba.org
More information about the samba-technical