Bug fix needs verification by guru

[Gerald (Jerry) Carter]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

derrell at samba.org wrote:

> I agree it shouldn't be necessary and that it's 
> a server bug, but are we going to go back and patch
> Samba 3.0.2? :-) I think our new stuff should
> interoperate with our old stuff if possible, and 
> it looks to me like we really shouldn't be
> setting that flag in this case anyway.

The capabilities bits should not affect a non-DFS share.
Setting it should be benign.  The client says it supports
DFS.  If this the share is not a DFS root, the bit should
not affect the server's behavior.

I was asking about testing 3.0.2 because I was curious about
the server bug.  Do you have any idea what the bug was ?


cheers, jerry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD4DBQFElrSeIR7qMdg1EfYRAjyCAJiLsWeA1Lf09MInBNXXD1wgjMMKAJ4yEJPE
g+SPRxYmb9QRXiIVAksLig==
=2jX2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----