Bug fix needs verification by guru
Gerald (Jerry) Carter
jerry at samba.org
Mon Jun 19 14:28:46 GMT 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
derrell at samba.org wrote:
> I agree it shouldn't be necessary and that it's
> a server bug, but are we going to go back and patch
> Samba 3.0.2? :-) I think our new stuff should
> interoperate with our old stuff if possible, and
> it looks to me like we really shouldn't be
> setting that flag in this case anyway.
The capabilities bits should not affect a non-DFS share.
Setting it should be benign. The client says it supports
DFS. If this the share is not a DFS root, the bit should
not affect the server's behavior.
I was asking about testing 3.0.2 because I was curious about
the server bug. Do you have any idea what the bug was ?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the samba-technical