another patches for net_ads.c
ma at sernet.de
Thu Aug 3 21:59:27 GMT 2006
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 11:56:51AM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> Some of the DEBUG level 0 messages probably should
> be moved to d_printf()'s. Others might need to be
> d_fpritnf(stderr,"..") instead. I think anything
> about 0 should stay with the DEBUG macro.
> Do you want to rework the patches some? or should
> I cherry pick?
I will rework, trying to find a suitable choice of
d_printf / d_fprintf(stderr,) and restoring the DEBUG
calls for higher debug levels.
More information about the samba-technical