support for mknod to windows now in cifs vfs
Steve French
smfrench at austin.rr.com
Sun Nov 20 04:00:46 GMT 2005
Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 13:55 -0600, Steve French wrote:
>
>
>>Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 22:30 -0600, Steve French wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>I added the code to cifs vfs to enable it do mknod of block and
>>>>chardevice even if the server does not support the Unix extensions (such
>>>>as Windows). This requires the "sfu" mount option to be specified
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Any reason why this isn't on by default?
>>>
>>>Andrew Bartlett
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>I agree with most of Martin's points - even on Windows there are a few
>>(possibly with Vista) three ways e.g. to do symlinks. Although sfu is
>>the most important way to do it it is a bit slower too.
>>
>>
>
>Isn't there also the mac 'magic file size' thing too? Did that change,
>or should we also cope with servers holding those files?
>
>Andrew Bartlett
>
>
>
For symlinks I am not as worried about samba (the server) interpreting
them as it is more important that the client recognize them. I think
that the Linux cifs client will probably have to add code to recognize
them but as I don't have access to any macs any more I can't create ones
to verify this feature.
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list