support for mknod to windows now in cifs vfs

Steve French smfrench at austin.rr.com
Sun Nov 20 04:00:46 GMT 2005


Andrew Bartlett wrote:

>On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 13:55 -0600, Steve French wrote:
>  
>
>>Andrew Bartlett wrote: 
>>    
>>
>>>On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 22:30 -0600, Steve French wrote:
>>>  
>>>      
>>>
>>>>I added the code to cifs vfs to enable it do mknod of block and 
>>>>chardevice even if the server does not support the Unix extensions (such 
>>>>as Windows).  This requires the "sfu" mount option to be specified 
>>>>    
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Any reason why this isn't on by default? 
>>>
>>>Andrew Bartlett
>>>  
>>>      
>>>
>>I agree with most of Martin's points - even on Windows there are a few
>>(possibly with Vista) three ways e.g. to do symlinks.  Although sfu is
>>the most important way to do it it is a bit slower too.
>>    
>>
>
>Isn't there also the mac 'magic file size' thing too?  Did that change,
>or should we also cope with servers holding those files?
>
>Andrew Bartlett
>
>  
>
For symlinks I am not as worried about samba (the server) interpreting 
them as it is more important that the client recognize them.  I think 
that the Linux cifs client will probably have to add code to recognize 
them but as I don't have access to any macs any more I can't create ones 
to verify this feature.


More information about the samba-technical mailing list