web server in Samba4

[Alexander Bokovoy]

On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 03:27:54PM +0200, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> > The 2nd reason is why I didn't use the openssl compatibility API in
> > gnutls for smbd. If someone can show me how to make that do what we
> > need to do then it can change, but if not then you will need gnutls
> > for smbd if you want TLS support.
> 
> Fair enough. Then I'd hope for some sort of HOWTO on implementing gnutls
> without voiding the vendor's warranty alongside Openssl on RedHat and
> all the other Linux distros that don't have it as standard. I haven't
> exactly gone out looking for advice on this yet, since I've never used
> gnutls nor had the slightest wish nor need to do so. Maybe Googling
> might help :)
Let vendors understand importance of either making OpenSSL async
interfaces available or including GNU TLS into their distribution.

In case of RedHat this is done already -- gnutls 1.0.20 is in RHEL4 as far
as I can see through my RHN subscription. It is in Fedora as well.
-- 
/ Alexander Bokovoy
Samba Team                      http://www.samba.org/
ALT Linux Team                  http://www.altlinux.org/
Midgard Project Ry              http://www.midgard-project.org/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20050529/6472ab41/attachment.bin