Dynamic groups (was Samba and groups > 16)

[David Collier-Brown]

Volker Lendecke wrote:
>  The only real way around this is a
> user-space implementation of NT acls, but then you lose the unix
> interoperability.

If groups and wimpy Unix permission bits work now, why would you
need full NT ACLs? Would not ordinary POSIX ones suffice???


--dave
-- 
David Collier-Brown,      | Always do right. This will gratify
Sun Microsystems, Toronto | some people and astonish the rest
davecb at canada.sun.com     |                      -- Mark Twain