libmsrpc for Samba 3
tpot at samba.org
Thu Jul 21 09:00:56 GMT 2005
On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 17:27 +1000, tridge at samba.org wrote:
> > The second API should take advantage of the features of the language you
> > are writing the wrappers in. For example you can accept or return
> > Python lists of strings, instead of a pointer to a unterminated block of
> > SAMR_String structures and a length.
> yep, I completely agree, although I would add that I think the 2nd API
> should be written on top of the first API, and written directly in the
> scripting language, rather than written in C and hooked in.
Yes - I forgot to mention that very important point. Thanks. (-:
More information about the samba-technical