current release patch page

Gerald (Jerry) Carter jerry at
Fri Aug 26 19:38:19 GMT 2005

Hash: SHA1

Steve Williams wrote:

> OMG!  I was never suggesting an "anonymous" SVN.  I am sorry if I wasn't
> clear.  I 100% agree that would an unmitigated disaster.  All I was
> proposing was a "complete" patch could be hung off a bugzilla report
> making it easy for a samba "delegate" to drop into the patches page.

Ah....ok.  I get it now.  I think patches need to be cleaned up
a little usually anyways.  So verifying that they apply against
the actual release code is a good idea.  It's easy to have patches
that apply against the 3.0 svn tree but not the release code.

> It could also make life a lot easier for the Samba team to release a
> "point release" (ie:  3.0.14a).  At a certain point, just apply all the
> outstanding patches to the latest release and voilla!

True.  We'l have to see how things work out long term.

cheers, jerry
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -


More information about the samba-technical mailing list