sticky bit and NTFS ACLs

Jeremy Allison jra at
Thu Aug 18 20:27:06 GMT 2005

On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 03:24:27PM -0500, Steven French wrote:
> I did not see where in the smbd code (if at all) we check for the sticky
> bit in returning ACL information.
> On Windows when you do a "chmod +t directoryname" it removes the
> permission from the ACL on the directory that is marked with the sticky
> bit.   Is that something
> we have left out of the samba acl code?

Yes it's not in there at present. On what shell are you typing "chmod" ?

More information about the samba-technical mailing list