sticky bit and NTFS ACLs
sfrench at us.ibm.com
Thu Aug 18 20:24:27 GMT 2005
I did not see where in the smbd code (if at all) we check for the sticky
bit in returning ACL information.
On Windows when you do a "chmod +t directoryname" it removes the
permission from the ACL on the directory that is marked with the sticky
bit. Is that something
we have left out of the samba acl code?
Senior Software Engineer
Linux Technology Center - IBM Austin
email: sfrench at-sign us dot ibm dot com
More information about the samba-technical