abartlet at samba.org
Mon Sep 20 06:38:50 GMT 2004
On Mon, 2004-09-20 at 13:47, James Peach wrote:
> Hi all,
> I notice that pam_smbpass is licensed under the GPLv2. What are the
> implications for using this on a system with some GPL programs and some
> proprietary programs?
> I'm a little confused, particularly in light of the lengths winbind goes
> to to keep the client-sode code LGPL ..
It's actually pretty simple - pam_smbpass was not written with this as a
design objective, while the winbind code was. Because pam_smbpass calls
directly into our core passdb code, it must be GPL licenced.
It also does a number of other tricks - in particular, you don't need
any daemons to run it, and the 'migration' code works a treat for some
You can (with a little work) make pam_winbind fit almost the same role.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20040920/9f379431/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical