lstat reporting different inode numbers on
abartlet at samba.org
Mon Nov 8 02:30:51 GMT 2004
On Mon, 2004-11-08 at 12:59, Steve French wrote:
> As another nit - when the Unix extensions are negotiated we really need
> to turn off the roundup logic on the reported allocation size of files
> in smbd/trans2.c (although I realize that there are apparent performance
> implications to the Windows client if you do it for other client types)
> - the Samba lie about file allocation sizes on du is a frequent complaint.
Jeremy claimed to have corrected this in current SVN. (After Linus told
him off ;-). In all seriousness, is the check for the CIFS VFS client
not being fired? Personally, I think we should be detecting the MS
clients, but that's the way the test is written at the moment.
Andrew Bartlett abartlet at samba.org
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College abartlet at hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20041108/67c2af51/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical