samba4: unsigned char -> uint8
abartlet at samba.org
Sat May 29 00:29:39 GMT 2004
On Sat, 2004-05-29 at 09:03, tridge at samba.org wrote:
> > any objections when I convert 'unsigned char' to uint8
> > in samba4
> > and 'unsigned' and 'unsigned int' to uint_t.
> That's OK with me.
Lets just make sure we don't take it too far - I don't want to see all
our string becoming 'int8 *' ;-)
Personally, I don't see the point in the short names for 'unsigned
int'. I understand the need for explicit 64 bit names in particular
(where various compilers call it a different thing) but what exactly was
wrong with 'unsigned int'?
Andrew Bartlett abartlet at pcug.org.au
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team abartlet at samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College abartlet at hawkerc.net
http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20040529/7bd7f76b/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical