samba4: unsigned char -> uint8

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Sat, 2004-05-29 at 09:03, tridge at samba.org wrote:
> Metze,
> 
>  > any objections when I convert 'unsigned char' to uint8
>  > in samba4
>  > 
>  > and 'unsigned' and 'unsigned int' to uint_t.
> 
> That's OK with me.

Lets just make sure we don't take it too far - I don't want to see all
our string becoming 'int8 *' ;-)

Personally, I don't see the point in the short names for 'unsigned
int'.  I understand the need for explicit 64 bit names in particular
(where various compilers call it a different thing) but what exactly was
wrong with 'unsigned int'?

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                 abartlet at pcug.org.au
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team  abartlet at samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College   abartlet at hawkerc.net
http://samba.org     http://build.samba.org     http://hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20040529/7bd7f76b/attachment.bin