standard_sub_basic() and current_user_info

Gerald (Jerry) Carter jerry at samba.org
Thu Mar 18 21:22:21 GMT 2004


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Can someone please tell me if the current_user_info
struct should still be used in the 3.0 tree ?  It's used
in some places but not in others and the inconsistency
is breaking many calls to standard_sub_basic().

I am working on the include = %%[GU].conf bug and just
need to know the current convention should be.

Note that standard_sub_basic() relies on current_user_info()
for the %D expansion.



cheers, jerry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFAWhMNIR7qMdg1EfYRAn4zAJ9oiz/HQp1DnUfyrB0w7y6ccPOhzgCdE8ff
k9e+IxIisk/yp+8A/NaACH4=
=nvhX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the samba-technical mailing list