i18n question.

Shiro Yamada shiro at miraclelinux.com
Fri Mar 5 10:34:32 GMT 2004

Hello there,

Jeremy Allison wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 06:28:23PM +0900, Shiro Yamada wrote:
>>Anyhow, we'll do the test for you, please let us know when its ready.
> Ok, bothe SAMBA_3_0 and HEAD CVS have the changes in. It should not
> break any existing paths. Things to try are mb pathnames where the
> second byte is a '\\' character - we should correctly cope with
> this.
> Jeremy.

Can I ask you a question here?
What do you mean by a path name here, a share name or a directory name?

If it is a share name, then no it is not working, smbd still fails to
find the valid share in smbd/service.c:find_service().
If it is a directory name, then we've never had a problem and we can
access to it without a problem.

One thing I've realised is that when Windows client access to a share
and a user attempts to make a new file from right click menu and choose
"create new" "text file", it no longer queries for a file name, it just
creates a new file with name "new txt file" or what ever you call it.

I'll spend some more time on the next week to do further testing.


More information about the samba-technical mailing list