samba4: unsigned char -> uint8

Tim Potter tpot at
Thu Jun 3 02:27:21 GMT 2004

On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 01:45:38PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:

> forward.  Currently int_t and uint_t are not defined in C99.  Here's the 
> relevant text from the standard:

Well that's a good enough reason not to use them.

> Should probably stick with int and unsigned int...

Yep.  The fact that int implies signed and unsigned implies int is
beginner C.  I don't think this is a good enough reason to change everything
to [u]int_t.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url :

More information about the samba-technical mailing list