no valid_user_struct ?

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 01:47, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Can anyone give me a case where the false branch in
> printing.c:is_owner() would be a valid code path ?
> I'm trying to remember how we could have a current_user
> {} struct but no valid_user_struct {}.  Right now my
> brain has dropped this out for lack a space.

security = share

I agree, it's a pain...

When I was still working on Samba3, I had a plan to get rid of this
special case, by always having some way the credentials of the
connecting user could be found, no matter what combination of options
was used.

Andrew Bartlett
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20040825/c247fbc2/attachment.bin