CVS update: samba/docs

Andrew Bartlett abartlet at
Sat Sep 27 23:53:56 GMT 2003

On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 09:43, Tim Potter wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 06:33:35PM +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > > Log Message:
> > > no need maintaining docs in this branch
> > 
> > Hi Jerry,
> > 
> > Could we perhaps create a seperate repository for the docs? Now that
> > Samba 3 is out, we'll have to keep three branches (SAMBA_3_0, HEAD and
> > samba4) synced, which is a pain.
> > 
> > We might want to autogenerate the docs on for the rsync version 
> > and the tarballs. What do you think?
> Well I think it's a great idea and don't have any objections.  I
> can set it up in CVS when someone gives the word.

The only issue will be with the 'this is valid for 3.0, but not 2.2'
stuff we have had in the past.  This (one presumes) will be much worse
for Samba 3.0 -> 4.0, and whatever HEAD becomes in the meantime...

But given the currently required level of effort to keep it all 'in
sync', it's probably worth it.

Andrew Bartlett

Andrew Bartlett                                 abartlet at
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team  abartlet at
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College   abartlet at
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url :

More information about the samba-technical mailing list