CVS update: samba/docs

[Simo Sorce]

On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 01:53, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 09:43, Tim Potter wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 06:33:35PM +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > 
> > > > Log Message:
> > > > no need maintaining docs in this branch
> > > 
> > > Hi Jerry,
> > > 
> > > Could we perhaps create a seperate repository for the docs? Now that
> > > Samba 3 is out, we'll have to keep three branches (SAMBA_3_0, HEAD and
> > > samba4) synced, which is a pain.
> > > 
> > > We might want to autogenerate the docs on samba.org for the rsync version 
> > > and the tarballs. What do you think?
> > 
> > Well I think it's a great idea and don't have any objections.  I
> > can set it up in CVS when someone gives the word.
> 
> The only issue will be with the 'this is valid for 3.0, but not 2.2'
> stuff we have had in the past.  This (one presumes) will be much worse
> for Samba 3.0 -> 4.0, and whatever HEAD becomes in the meantime...

I think we can "fix" this problem by putting the docs in the right
_RELEASE branch when a release is put out.
This way each release has it's own documentation fixed in time.

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce - simo.sorce at xsec.it
Xsec s.r.l. - http://www.xsec.it
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
mobile: +39 329 328 7702
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399