Various little questions
Christopher R. Hertel
crh at ubiqx.mn.org
Wed Oct 1 17:18:43 GMT 2003
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 11:18:04AM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
> | 2) The delete readonly parameter
> | I did a simple test of the "delete readonly" parameter. I found that
> | W2K allowed me to delete a readonly file on a Samba share no matter
> | what the setting of "delete readonly".
> | Can someone else confirm this? What am I seeing and what is the
> | expected behavior?
> | Reading the docs, I assumed that the default (delete readonly = no)
> | would prevent me from deleting a readonly file. How does W2K get
> | around this? Does it cause Samba to chmod the file?
> File a bug if you found one :-)
I am trying to figure out whether it's a bug or not. I need a clearer
picture of what to expect.
It may be that W2K is chmoding the file in order to delete it, which would
"Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)----- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)----- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)----- crh at ubiqx.mn.org
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/ -)----- crh at ubiqx.org
More information about the samba-technical