Samba 2.2.7 Oddities
abartlet at samba.org
Sun Nov 9 07:08:21 GMT 2003
On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 17:44, Michael B Allen wrote:
> >> These are admittedly obscure and will likely not effect effect windows
> >> clients too badly
> > I would never say that :-)
> > The whole samba4 exercise it on the basis that every non-conforming
> > behaviour is a bug waiting to be exposed, so we certainly want to fix
> > them.
> What about the non-conforming behaviour required for clients to function
> properly like how the PrimaryDomain field in an SMB_COM_NEGOTIATE_RESPONSE
> is always Unicode and never aligned? I think we need a new dialect called
> "NT LM 0.12 CORRECTED (NO REALLY)". Then we could all be idealists.
Well that string goes away with extended security, but I get your point
Naturally, we conform not to the spec, but to what Microsoft does...
Andrew Bartlett abartlet at pcug.org.au
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team abartlet at samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College abartlet at hawkerc.net
http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20031109/6244b34d/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical