What's about a HEAD_3_0 branch?

[Gerald (Jerry) Carter]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:

> I just see you're reactivating HEAD.
> 
> Wouldn't it be good to have a HEAD_3_0 branch and let HEAD for tridge's samba4.
> 
> If we do this now, you don't need to merge things arround a 2nd time...
> 
> What do you think?

I don't think so.  HEAD will need to continue on.  We'll just have 
a SAMBA_4_0 branch or another something.




cheers, jerry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/

iD8DBQE/FUFIIR7qMdg1EfYRAq08AJ9oxtvj9OsH3FONaM0RYYri7n7fqgCg5eHA
Uoo+AGtHabGQnKeeKRepQkU=
=6eDj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----