SMB signing glitch

Jeremy Allison jra at
Sat Dec 27 08:05:45 GMT 2003

On Sat, Dec 27, 2003 at 05:50:47PM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> If we do it this way, I think that the BSRSPYL signing engine should
> just increment the sequence number, rather than assuming a magic '2'.

We can add that on top of Volkers patch. I'll look into it
when I get back.


More information about the samba-technical mailing list