connection.tdb IP vs. NetBIOS name
Gerald (Jerry) Carter
jerry at samba.org
Fri Dec 5 17:08:12 GMT 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Chris Lalancette wrote:
> Hello all,
> I am having a problem with Samba 3.0.0 (I have actually tested
> this with 3.0.1pre3, and seem to have the same problem). I am trying to
> add a new message to smbcontrol. I have put the code into smbcontrol.c,
> and I can deliver messages to the samba processes (using the command
> line: ./smbcontrol smbd <mymsg>). The problem is that
> messages get delivered to the Samba processes differently depending on
> whether I am connecting to them by IP address, or by NetBIOS name. If I
> use the NetBIOS name, the message gets delivered to all processes; if I
> use the IP address, the message really only gets delivered to the main
> smbd process (the reason that this is important is that I would like to
> not use nmbd, if possible). I have tracked this down in the code, and it
> seems that the difference is in the way new connections get added to the
> connection.tdb database. My question is whether this is intentional, a
> bug in the client, or a bug in Samba?
Chris, Can you send me a patchfile of your changes? I need to
understand exactly what you are trying to accomplish.
cheers, jerry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQE/0Lt8IR7qMdg1EfYRAnLcAKDn2BFWnjFK64BDZX163gnnQICWNQCcD3cY
XgRKNf9kC83qel+uyKxZaro=
=eAub
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list