Samba 3.0 & Openssl
abartlet at samba.org
Thu Dec 4 10:17:34 GMT 2003
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 12:07:05PM +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 11:14:15AM +0530, Yashpal Nagar wrote:
> > On Wednesday 03 December 2003 19:26, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 14:53, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > > Hash: SHA1
> > > >
> > > > Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > > | On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 14:30, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> > > > |>I'll point out that the RedHAT RPMS on samba.org werre built
> > > > |>on vanilla installs. No upgraded packages. Just the default
> > > > |>ones installed off of CD. If you have upgraded any components,
> > > > |>it would explain why rpm complains.
> > > > |
> > > > | Jerry, shouldn't we build packages for the fully upgraded distro
> > > > | instead?
> > > > | There are many security fixes in the upgrades. I think we should make
> > > > | our binaries compatible with up to date distributions.
> > > >
> > > > Nope. vanilla systems. that's my rule. people can run
> > > > rpmbuild --rebuild <package> if they want to.
> > But on a Redhat 9.0 System which was *everything* installation type it failed.
> > [root at yash yash]# rpm --rebuild samba-3.0.0-2.src.rpm
> > --rebuild: unknown option
> > [root at yash yash]#
> That means that your claim about *everything* is wrong -- you don't have
> rpm-build package installed. Yes, POPT-enabled application (rpm in the
> case) does issue wrong error message when aliased command line option
> reffers to non-existant program.
> So, you need to install rpm-build package along with neccessary
> glibc-devel and other development packages.
On my RH9 systems you need to do rpmb --rebuild, but maybe I'm missing
More information about the samba-technical