Samba 3.0 & Openssl
a.bokovoy at sam-solutions.net
Thu Dec 4 10:07:05 GMT 2003
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 11:14:15AM +0530, Yashpal Nagar wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 December 2003 19:26, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 14:53, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > | On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 14:30, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> > > |>I'll point out that the RedHAT RPMS on samba.org werre built
> > > |>on vanilla installs. No upgraded packages. Just the default
> > > |>ones installed off of CD. If you have upgraded any components,
> > > |>it would explain why rpm complains.
> > > |
> > > | Jerry, shouldn't we build packages for the fully upgraded distro
> > > | instead?
> > > | There are many security fixes in the upgrades. I think we should make
> > > | our binaries compatible with up to date distributions.
> > >
> > > Nope. vanilla systems. that's my rule. people can run
> > > rpmbuild --rebuild <package> if they want to.
> But on a Redhat 9.0 System which was *everything* installation type it failed.
> [root at yash yash]# rpm --rebuild samba-3.0.0-2.src.rpm
> --rebuild: unknown option
> [root at yash yash]#
That means that your claim about *everything* is wrong -- you don't have
rpm-build package installed. Yes, POPT-enabled application (rpm in the
case) does issue wrong error message when aliased command line option
reffers to non-existant program.
So, you need to install rpm-build package along with neccessary
glibc-devel and other development packages.
/ Alexander Bokovoy
Samba Team http://www.samba.org/
ALT Linux Team http://www.altlinux.org/
Midgard Project Ry http://www.midgard-project.org/
More information about the samba-technical